Re: [HACKERS] Bizarre choice of case for RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Bizarre choice of case for RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE
Date
Msg-id 20170311032448.GB19616@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Bizarre choice of case for RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar  9, 2017 at 11:06:56PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> > (And no, I don't especially
> > approve of RELKIND_SEQUENCE being 'S' either, but it's far too late to
> > change that.)
> 
> FWIW the reason SEQUENCE uses S instead of 's' is that the latter was
> taken for "special" relations, which we removed a few releases ago
> (commit 3a694bb0a1).

Ah!  I knew there was a reason for 'S', but couldn't remember it.  :-)

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Mengxing Liu"
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] [GSOC 17] Eliminate O(N^2) scaling from rw-conflict tracking inserializable transactions
Next
From: Eric Ridge
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] How to get the 'ctid' from a record type?