Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: two slab-like memory allocators - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
| From | Andres Freund |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: two slab-like memory allocators |
| Date | |
| Msg-id | 20170228034232.4h7ouyhxq4lbbao2@alap3.anarazel.de Whole thread Raw |
| In response to | Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: two slab-like memory allocators (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Responses |
Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: two slab-like memory allocators
|
| List | pgsql-hackers |
On 2017-02-28 01:44:42 +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On 02/27/2017 06:42 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Yea, I hadn't yet realized when writing that that termite actually,
> > despite running on ppc64, compiles a 32bit postgres. Will thus
> > duplicate StandardChunkHeader's contents in to slab.c :( - I don't
> > see an easy way around that...
>
> I've tried this - essentially copying the StandardChunkHeader's contents
> into SlabChunk, but that does not seem to do the trick, sadly. Per pahole,
> the structures then (at least on armv7l) look like this:
>
> struct SlabChunk {
> void * block; /* 0 4 */
> MemoryContext context; /* 4 4 */
> Size size; /* 8 4 */
> Size requested_size; /* 12 4 */
>
> /* size: 16, cachelines: 1, members: 4 */
> /* last cacheline: 16 bytes */
> };
>
> struct StandardChunkHeader {
> MemoryContext context; /* 0 4 */
> Size size; /* 4 4 */
> Size requested_size; /* 8 4 */
>
> /* size: 12, cachelines: 1, members: 3 */
> /* last cacheline: 12 bytes */
> };
> So SlabChunk happens to be perfectly aligned (MAXIMUM_ALIGNOF=8), and so
> pfree() grabs the block pointer but thinks it's the context :-(
Hm. The only way I can think of to do achieve the right thing here would
be something like:
typedef struct StandardChunkHeader
{ MemoryContext context; /* owning context */ Size size; /* size of data space allocated in
chunk*/
#ifdef MEMORY_CONTEXT_CHECKING /* when debugging memory usage, also store actual requested size */ Size
requested_size;
#endif union { char *data; /* ensure MAXALIGNed */ int64 alignof_int64; double
alignof_double; } d;
} StandardChunkHeader;
typedef struct SlabChunk
{ void *block; StandardChunkHeader header;
} SlabChunk;
That's not overly pretty, but also not absolutely disgusting. Unifying
the padding calculations between allocators would be a nice side-effect.
Note we at least previously had such union/double tricks in the tree, via
http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=e1a11d93111ff3fba7a91f3f2ac0b0aca16909a8
It might be a good idea to have configure define maxaligned_type instead
of including both int64/double (although it'll IIRC practically always
be double that's maxaligned).
Independently of this, we really should redefine StandardChunkHeader to
be only the MemoryContext. There's no need to have size/requested_size
part of StandardChunkHeader, given there's
MemoryContextMethods->get_chunk_space().
> Not sure what to do about this - the only thing I can think about is
> splitting SlabChunk into two separate structures, and align them
> independently.
>
> The attached patch does that - it probably needs a bit more work on the
> comments to make it commit-ready, but it fixes the test_deconding tests on
> the rpi3 board I'm using for testing.
That'd work as well, although at the very least I'd want to add a
comment explaining the actual memory layout somewhere - this is a bit
too finnicky to expect to get right the next time round.
Any preferences?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
pgsql-hackers by date: