On 2017-02-23 14:26:07 -0600, Jim Nasby wrote:
> On 2/23/17 6:38 AM, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > > I'm not so confident, but the "'tis" seems to me to be a typo of
> > > "it's".
> > That is an archaic way of contracting the same words differently:
>
> Given the number of non-native English speakers we have, it's probably worth
> changing it...
I'm a non-native speaker and I actually like discovering new language
"features" every now and then. I think as long as it's not inhibiting
understanding to much - which doesn't seem to be the case here - it's
fine to keep things like this.
- Andres
