Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again
Date
Msg-id 20170223000033.GD20486@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Feb  3, 2017 at 07:59:26AM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> It should be documented and presented (who is read a documentation? :-))
> 
> It is not only PostgreSQL issue, same issue has to have any other databases.
> The Oracle architecture is very specific and often question is, how to map
> Oracle database to PostgreSQL. A common questions - how schema should be used,
> where schema should be used, where database should be used. What is practical
> limit of size of PostgreSQL catalogue.

I did write a blog entry on this topic:
http://momjian.us/main/blogs/pgblog/2012.html#April_23_2012

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump does not refresh matviews from extensions
Next
From: Erik Rijkers
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication existing data copy