Re: [HACKERS] WIP: About CMake v2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: [HACKERS] WIP: About CMake v2
Date
Msg-id 20170127144055.nc7ckp5tja5kquxu@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] WIP: About CMake v2  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> Right now, however, the patch isn't moving at all, and I don't see it
> going into PG10, so I'm fine with returning with feedback.

There are a bunch of side patches that we should apply separately, such
as the pgcrypto fix.  I don't understand why they are part of this patch
series, really, given that they seem largely independent prerequisites.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_background contrib module proposal
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_ls_dir & friends still have a hard-coded superuser check