Re: [HACKERS] Duplicate node tag assignments - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Duplicate node tag assignments
Date
Msg-id 20161228163739.75vziks2vnht6idb@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] Duplicate node tag assignments  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2016-12-28 11:33:31 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> By chance I happened to notice that the recent partition patch pushed
> us over the number of available node tags between
> 
>     T_A_Expr = 900,

> So I'm leaning to the second, more drastic, solution.  Thoughts?

Alternatively we could add a -Wduplicate-enum/-Werror=duplicate-enum for
clang. That'd protect against that in all enums...

Andres



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] Duplicate node tag assignments
Next
From: Cynthia Shang
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Fix for documentation of timestamp type