On 2016-12-08 14:53:58 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2016-12-08 17:38:38 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > The habit of zero-initializing Datums has got exactly nothing to do with
> > V0 functions; it's about ensuring consistent results and avoiding
> > heisenbugs from use of uninitialized memory. I do not think we should
> > drop it.
>
> Well, V0 functions don't have a real way to get information about NULL,
> and we allow non-strict V0 functions, so?
Oh, and the regression tests fail in V0 functions if you drop that.
Andres
