Re: Indirect indexes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Indirect indexes
Date
Msg-id 20161112172818.s55s5xxohg5enmbj@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Indirect indexes  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Indirect indexes
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2016-11-01 01:43:31 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > I propose we introduce the concept of "indirect indexes".
> 
> This is a WIP non-functional patch for indirect indexes.  I've been
> distracted from working on it for some time already and will be off-line
> for half this month yet, but since this was discussed and seems to be
> considered a welcome idea, I am posting it for those who want to have a
> look at what I'm doing.

I see that this patch has a CF entry, but I'm unclear what reviewer
ought to do at the current state?  There's a lot of stuff closer to
being committable in this fest...


Regards,

Andres



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Change the way that LWLocks for extensions are allocated.
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Remove the comment on the countereffectiveness of large shared_buffers on Windows