Re: Hash tables in dynamic shared memory - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Hash tables in dynamic shared memory
Date
Msg-id 20161006014824.ojhe4h7xqztaaudl@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Hash tables in dynamic shared memory  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: Hash tables in dynamic shared memory  (John Gorman <johngorman2@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2016-10-05 08:02:42 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Oct 5, 2016 1:23 AM, "Thomas Munro" <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>
> wrote:
> > Another thought: it could be used to make things like
> > pg_stat_statements not have to be in shared_preload_libraries.

> That would indeed be a great improvement. And possibly also allow the
> changing of the max number of statements it can track without a restart?

There's the issue of having to serialize / load the file around a
restart...

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: Hash tables in dynamic shared memory
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Our "fallback" atomics implementation doesn't actually work