Re: pgsql-performance issue - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: pgsql-performance issue
Date
Msg-id 20160829201403.gijea6hlcaceejby@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to pgsql-performance issue  (debasis.moharana@ipathsolutions.co.in)
List pgsql-performance
Hi,

On 2016-08-20 08:38:43 +0000, debasis.moharana@ipathsolutions.co.in wrote:
> I have a PostgreSQL 9.5 instance running on Windows 8 machine with 4GB of
> RAM.This server is mainly used for inserting/updating large amounts of data
> via copy/insert/update commands, and seldom for running select queries.
>
> Here are the relevant configuration parameters I changed:
>
> max_connections = 100
> shared_buffers = 512MB
> effective_cache_size = 3GB
> work_mem = 12233kB
> maintenance_work_mem = 256MB
> min_wal_size = 1GB max_wal_size = 2GB
> checkpoint_completion_target = 0.7
> wal_buffers = 16MB
> default_statistics_target = 100
>
> After setting in postgresql.conf. I run the select query to fetch large
> amount of record of 29000 in postgresql but it takes 10.3 seconds but the
> same query takes 2 seconds for execution in MSSQL.
>
> So my query is how to improve the perfermance in postgresql.

Please provide the output EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS) yourquery; and your
query. Then we'll possibly be able to help you - atm we don't have
enough information.

Regards,

Andres


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Tommi Kaksonen
Date:
Subject: Re: Slow query with big tables
Next
From: Bobby Mozumder
Date:
Subject: Possible to find disk IOs for a Query?