Re: _mdfd_getseg can be expensive - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: _mdfd_getseg can be expensive
Date
Msg-id 20160819002614.obvu6nuk7pi25o63@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: _mdfd_getseg can be expensive  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
Responses Re: _mdfd_getseg can be expensive  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
Re: _mdfd_getseg can be expensive  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2016-06-30 18:14:15 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > Took a while. But here we go. The attached version is a significantly
> > revised version of my earlier patch. Notably I've pretty much entirely
> > revised the code in _mdfd_getseg() to be more similar to the state in
> > master. Also some comment policing.
>
> Are you planning to pick this up again, Andres?

Rebased version attached. A review would be welcome. Plan to push this
forward otherwise in the not too far away future.

Andres

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool)
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: _mdfd_getseg can be expensive