Re: Wait events monitoring future development - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Wait events monitoring future development
Date
Msg-id 20160810144347.GC21285@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Wait events monitoring future development  (Satoshi Nagayasu <snaga@uptime.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 11:37:36PM +0900, Satoshi Nagayasu wrote:
> Agreed.
> 
> If people are facing with some difficult situation in terms of performance,
> they may accept some (one-time) overhead to resolve the issue.
> But if they don't have (recognize) any issue, they may not.
> 
> That's one of the realities according to my experiences.

Yes.  Many people are arguing for specific defaults based on what _they_
would want, not what the average user would want.  Sophisticated users
will know about this and turn it on when desired.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+                     Ancient Roman grave inscription +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Satoshi Nagayasu
Date:
Subject: Re: Wait events monitoring future development
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal for CSN based snapshots