On 2016-08-05 16:35:02 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> In particular, it seems to me that rather than implement just this,
> we really ought to provide an API that lets FDWs actually implement
> TRUNCATE if they feel like it. Having the trigger and not TRUNCATE
> capability itself just screams "half baked", wouldn't you say?
Both is fine with me. I do object to the position that we need an answer
for all utility commands - that seems like a too high hurdle to pass -
but implementing truncate for FDWs directly sounds good.
