On 2016-05-06 19:43:24 -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> It's disappointing that I am not getting more consistent numbers,
> but NUMA can be hard to manage that way.
FWIW, in my experience, unless you disable autovacuum (or rather
auto-analyze), the effects from non-predicable analyze runs with
long-running snapshots are worse. I mean the numa effects suck, but in
r/w workload effects of analyze are often much worse.
That comment reminds me of a question I had: Did you consider the effect
of this patch on analyze? It uses a snapshot, and by memory you've not
built in a defense against analyze being cancelled.
> Will push shortly with the nit-pick fixes you requested.
Cool.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
