* Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> Seems reasonable otherwise.
Attached patch implements this change to not LOCK the table in cases
where we don't need to. I'll push this with my other changes to pg_dump
tomorrow (and I've included it in an updated, complete, set of patches
sent on the thread where those changes were being discussed already).
Wanted to include it here also for completeness.
Comments welcome, of course.
Thanks!
Stephen
