Hi,
Pursuant to promises made in Brussels a couple of months ago, I set up a
machine to run and expose the "make coverage" report under "make
check-world". Some people have already heard about this.
I would like to collect ideas on how to improve this. For example
* Should we run something other than "make check-world" As far as I
know, that covers all or almost all the tests we have; are there things
that we should have and are not running? If so, how do we go about
enabling them?
* buildfarm doesn't run make check-world for reasons of its own. Maybe
we should run exactly what a typical buildfarm animal runs? That way,
the coverage report would be closer to what we're actually verifying.
* Should we keep historical reports to study how numbers change in time?
Maybe save one report a week or something like that?
* Any other comments?
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.linkedin.com/in/alvherre
