Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics
Date
Msg-id 20160414023542.7if7rsmynx6jndia@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics  (Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>)
Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2016-04-14 07:59:07 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> What you want to see by prewarming?

Prewarming appears to greatly reduce the per-run variance on that
machine, making it a lot easier to get meaningful results.  Thus it'd
make it easier to compare pre/post padding numbers.

> Will it have safe effect, if the tests are run for 10 or 15 mins
> rather than 5 mins?

s/safe/same/? If so, no, I doesn't look that way. The order of buffers
appears to play a large role; and it won't change in a memory resident
workload over one run.

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add regression tests for multiple synchronous standbys.
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2