On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 10:08:23PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 8:39 AM, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:22:27AM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > > Well, if we *don't* do the rewrite before we release it, then we have to
> > > instead put information about the new version of the functions into the
> > old
> > > structure I think.
> > >
> > > So I think it's an open issue.
> >
> > Works for me...
> >
> > [This is a generic notification.]
> >
> > The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 9.6 open item. Magnus,
> > since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this
> > open
> > item. If that responsibility lies elsewhere, please let us know whose
> > responsibility it is to fix this. Since new open items may be discovered
> > at
> > any time and I want to plan to have them all fixed well in advance of the
> > ship
> > date, I will appreciate your efforts toward speedy resolution. Please
> > present, within 72 hours, a plan to fix the defect within seven days of
> > this
> > message. Thanks.
> >
>
> I won't have time to do the bigger rewrite/reordeirng by then, but I can
> certainly commit to having the smaller updates done to cover the new
> functionality in less than a week. If nothing else, that'll be something
> for me to do on the flight over to pgconf.us.
Thanks for that plan; it sounds good.
