Re: [BUGS] pgbench -C -M prepared gives an error - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tatsuo Ishii
Subject Re: [BUGS] pgbench -C -M prepared gives an error
Date
Msg-id 20160317.114321.169671826955986940.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [BUGS] pgbench -C -M prepared gives an error  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [BUGS] pgbench -C -M prepared gives an error
List pgsql-hackers
> We're not resetting the prepared[] array when we pull the plug on an
> existing connection.
> 
> Is a connection per transaction really a sane case to consider?

Yes, I would think. This case reveals the connection overhead. We
already are able to handle the simple query cases. Why not for
extended query cases?

Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] pgbench -C -M prepared gives an error
Next
From: Vitaly Burovoy
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Integer overflow in timestamp[tz]_part() and date/time boundaries check