Re: query reboot pgsql 9.5.1 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: query reboot pgsql 9.5.1
Date
Msg-id 20160304221613.GA745676@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: query reboot pgsql 9.5.1  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
David G. Johnston wrote:

> ​To be more clear, you need to run a query that will complete in our
> lifetime (and without an OOM error) with all three of ANALYZE, BUFFERS, and
> TIMING specified for the EXPLAIN.

I think the problem is pretty clear.  The plan is sensible yet the
result doesn't seem to be.  Why do you think using up all the memory is
a sensible result here?

Jaime Casanova suggested that maybe the @> operator have memory leaks.
Or perhaps the GIN index machinery that's using them.

--
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: query reboot pgsql 9.5.1
Next
From: Rafal Pietrak
Date:
Subject: Re: multiple UNIQUE indices for FK