Re: postgres_fdw vs. force_parallel_mode on ppc - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Noah Misch
Subject Re: postgres_fdw vs. force_parallel_mode on ppc
Date
Msg-id 20160228000547.GA663083@tornado.leadboat.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: postgres_fdw vs. force_parallel_mode on ppc  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: postgres_fdw vs. force_parallel_mode on ppc
Re: postgres_fdw vs. force_parallel_mode on ppc
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 04:16:58PM +0530, Robert Haas wrote:
> Committed these patches after revising the comment you wrote and
> adding documentation.

I've modified buildfarm member mandrill to use force_parallel_mode=regress and
max_parallel_degree=5; a full run passes.  We'll now see if it intermittently
fails the stats test, like Tom witnessed:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/30385.1456077923@sss.pgh.pa.us



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: exposing pg_controldata and pg_config as functions
Next
From: Kartyshov Ivan
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal: get oldest LSN - function