Re: postgres_fdw vs. force_parallel_mode on ppc - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: postgres_fdw vs. force_parallel_mode on ppc
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoacN4zsL4-EWDVLr2xT7t2vJk_8gcUU6G=ErUof5g83sQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: postgres_fdw vs. force_parallel_mode on ppc  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 7:05 PM, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 04:16:58PM +0530, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Committed these patches after revising the comment you wrote and
>> adding documentation.
>
> I've modified buildfarm member mandrill to use force_parallel_mode=regress and
> max_parallel_degree=5; a full run passes.  We'll now see if it intermittently
> fails the stats test, like Tom witnessed:
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/30385.1456077923@sss.pgh.pa.us

Thank you.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dmitry Dolgov
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATH] Jsonb, insert a new value into an array at arbitrary position
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers