Re: postgres_fdw vs. force_parallel_mode on ppc - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: postgres_fdw vs. force_parallel_mode on ppc
Date
Msg-id 29003.1456985458@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: postgres_fdw vs. force_parallel_mode on ppc  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
Responses Re: postgres_fdw vs. force_parallel_mode on ppc  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> writes:
> I've modified buildfarm member mandrill to use force_parallel_mode=regress and
> max_parallel_degree=5; a full run passes.  We'll now see if it intermittently
> fails the stats test, like Tom witnessed:
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/30385.1456077923@sss.pgh.pa.us

http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=mandrill&dt=2016-03-02%2023%3A34%3A10
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
Subject: Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: "Causal reads" mode for load balancing reads without stale data