Robert Haas wrote:
> The eventual committer is likely to be much happier with this patch if
> you guys have achieved consensus among yourselves on the best
> approach.
>
> (Disclaimer: The eventual committer won't be me. I'm not a Python
> guy. But we try to proceed by consensus rather than committer-dictat
> around here, when we can. Obviously the committer has the final say
> at some level, but it's better if that power doesn't need to be
> exercised too often.)
Actually I imagine that if there's no agreement between author and first
reviewer, there might not *be* a committer in the first place. Perhaps
try to get someone else to think about it and make a decision. It is
possible that some other committer is able to decide by themselves but I
wouldn't count on it.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
