Re: 2016-01 Commitfest - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: 2016-01 Commitfest
Date
Msg-id 20160125180202.GA517026@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 2016-01 Commitfest  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: 2016-01 Commitfest  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2016-01-25 13:36:04 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > We still have 41 patches that haven't gotten enough review though.  The
> > bad part about it is that there's a number of patches that have been
> > bouncing for many commitfests now.  Here's a list of the patches with
> > the most such actions (both in Needs Review and Ready for Committer
> > state):
> 
> > * https://commitfest.postgresql.org/8/260/
> >   checkpoint continuous flushing
> 
> FWIW, I've been working and benchmarking this a lot over the last
> weeks.  After finally nailing down the performance regression due to wal
> writer, thins are looking good.  I plan to post an updated version soon.

Excellent.  I assume the walwriter bug is going to get fixed separately,
probably backpatched too?

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Set search_path + server-prepared statements = cached plan must not change result type
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [POC] FETCH limited by bytes.