Re: 2016-01 Commitfest - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: 2016-01 Commitfest
Date
Msg-id 20160125175420.GD25778@awork2.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 2016-01 Commitfest  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: 2016-01 Commitfest  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: 2016-01 Commitfest  (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2016-01-25 13:36:04 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> We still have 41 patches that haven't gotten enough review though.  The
> bad part about it is that there's a number of patches that have been
> bouncing for many commitfests now.  Here's a list of the patches with
> the most such actions (both in Needs Review and Ready for Committer
> state):

> * https://commitfest.postgresql.org/8/260/
>   checkpoint continuous flushing

FWIW, I've been working and benchmarking this a lot over the last
weeks.  After finally nailing down the performance regression due to wal
writer, thins are looking good.  I plan to post an updated version soon.

Andres



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: is there a deep unyielding reason to limit U&'' literals to ASCII?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Set search_path + server-prepared statements = cached plan must not change result type