Re: checkpointer continuous flushing - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: checkpointer continuous flushing
Date
Msg-id 20160121081140.GN26711@awork2.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: checkpointer continuous flushing  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2016-01-21 11:33:15 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 9:07 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > I don't think it's strongly related - the contention here is on read
> > access to the clog, not on write access.
> 
> Aren't reads on clog contended with parallel writes to clog?

Sure. But you're not going to beat "no access to the clog" due to hint
bits, by making parallel writes a bit better citizens.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Batch update of indexes
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Releasing in September