Re: Tsvector editing functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Tsvector editing functions
Date
Msg-id 20160118212103.GA132670@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Tsvector editing functions  (Stas Kelvich <s.kelvich@postgrespro.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
So, Tomas, Teodor, did you like this new version of the patch?

Stas Kelvich wrote:

> > 7) Some of the functions use intexterm that does not match the function
> >   name. I see two such cases - to_tsvector and setweight. Is there a
> >   reason for that?
> 
> Because sgml compiler wants unique indexterm. Both functions that you
> mentioned use overloading of arguments and have non-unique name.

This sounds wrong.  I think what you should really do is use

<indexterm> <primary>foo</primary> <secondary>bar</secondary>
</indexterm>

to distinguish the two entries.

It's a bit funny that you reintroduce the "unrecognized weight: %d"
(instead of %c) in tsvector_setweight_by_filter.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Igal @ Lucee.org"
Date:
Subject: Re: system mingw not recognized
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: plpgsql - DECLARE - cannot to use %TYPE or %ROWTYPE for composite types