On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 06:05:11PM +0000, Robert Haas wrote:
> postgres_fdw: Add ORDER BY to some remote SQL queries.
>
> If the join problem's entire ORDER BY clause can be pushed to the
> remote server, consider a path that adds this ORDER BY clause. If
> use_remote_estimate is on, we cost this path using an additional
> remote EXPLAIN. If not, we just estimate that the path costs 20%
> more, which is intended to be large enough that we won't request a
> remote sort when it's not helpful, but small enough that we'll have
> the remote side do the sort when in doubt. In some cases, the remote
> sort might actually be free, because the remote query plan might
> happen to produce output that is ordered the way we need, but without
> remote estimates we have no way of knowing that.
>
> It might also be useful to request sorted output from the remote side
> if it enables an efficient merge join, but this patch doesn't attempt
> to handle that case.
Does this complete FDW join pushdown?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Roman grave inscription +
