Re: BUG #13774: upgrade from 9.1 to 9.4 'succeeds' without enough disk space - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: BUG #13774: upgrade from 9.1 to 9.4 'succeeds' without enough disk space
Date
Msg-id 20151114164733.GA21142@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #13774: upgrade from 9.1 to 9.4 'succeeds' without enough disk space  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: BUG #13774: upgrade from 9.1 to 9.4 'succeeds' without enough disk space  ("Manu Joye" <manu.joye@coopapotheken.be>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 08:24:02PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Thank you for the report.  This is embarrassing, but the code was
> testing for the wrong return value on Windows.  We used a macro to
> define the same symbol on Windows and Unix (pg_copy_file), but for
> Windows, we should have been testing for zero, while the code only
> tested for a -1 return failure.  You can see the Windows failure zero
> return value defined here:
>
>     https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa363851%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
>
>     Return value
>
>     If the function succeeds, the return value is nonzero.
>     If the function fails, the return value is zero. To get extended error
>     information, call GetLastError.
>
> We do something similar for hard links, but we create a wrapper function
> to return the proper value (-1), and we call it twice, so it seems wise
> to keep that unchanged.
>
> The attached patch fixes this and will be applied to all active branches
> in the next minor release.  Sorry for the bug.

Patch applied and backpatched through 9.1.

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Roman grave inscription                             +

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #13741: vacuumdb does not accept valid password
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #13701: Spelling error in bgwriter_lru_multiplier comment