On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 05:39:36PM +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> > I am happy to finish it, but I am no less happy if you finish it. Which do
> > you prefer?
>
> Please go ahead and commit.
>
> > Should the back-branch commits mirror the master branch? A more-cautious
> > alternative would be to, in back branches, wrap the change in #ifdefs so it
> > takes effect only on Windows, OpenBSD and NetBSD. It could break setups with
> > local firewall rules that block connections to "127.0.0.1" or "::1" without
> > blocking "0.0.0.0" or "::". Such firewall rules sound outlandish enough that
> > I would be fairly comfortable not worrying about this and making the change
> > unconditional in all branches. It's a judgment call, though.
>
> I think back patching with #ifdefs is better. On Windows etc. the case
> has been broken anyway and the fix should only bring benefits to users.
I committed it with #ifdef in 9.1-9.4 and without #ifdef in 9.5 and master.
