* Stephen Frost (sfrost@snowman.net) wrote:
> Perhaps it'd be better to have pgsql-bugs be the "Package owner", who
> also gets emails about bug activity on their packages. That way, we
> could have a 'jdbc' package whose owner is pgsql-jdbc and pgsql-bugs
> wouldn't end up with that bug traffic (which, I believe, is what we'd
> want...).
To clarify, I mean 'Maintainer', and this would be identical to how the
PostgreSQL packages in Debian are currently maintained:
Maintainers for postgresql are Debian PostgreSQL Maintainers
<pkg-postgresql-public@lists.alioth.debian.org>.
And, handily, that list is archived here:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-postgresql-public/
One example of how it's used can be seen with this thread:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-postgresql-public/2015-September/002803.html
Thanks!
Stephen
