Re: [DOCS] max_worker_processes on the standby - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: [DOCS] max_worker_processes on the standby
Date
Msg-id 20151002145839.GZ2573@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [DOCS] max_worker_processes on the standby  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [DOCS] max_worker_processes on the standby
Re: [DOCS] max_worker_processes on the standby
List pgsql-hackers
Fujii Masao wrote:

> What happens if pg_xact_commit_timestamp() is called in standby after
> track_commit_timestamp is disabled in master, DeactivateCommitTs() is
> called and all commit_ts files are removed in standby? I tried that case
> and got the following assertion failure.

Ah.  So the standby needs to keep the module activated if it's enabled
locally, even when it receives a message that the master turned it off.
Here's a patch.

Thanks for your continued testing!

--
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: Rework access method interface
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: What is the extent of FDW join pushdown support in 9.5?