On 2015-09-15 12:51:24 +0300, YUriy Zhuravlev wrote:
> We had a version like your patch. But this is only half the work. Example:
> state = pg_atomic_read_u32(&buf->state);
> if ((state & BUF_REFCOUNT_MASK) == 0
> && (state & BUF_USAGECOUNT_MASK) == 0)
> After the first command somebody can change buf->state and local state not
> actual.
No, they can't in a a relevant manner. We hold the buffer header lock.
> In this embodiment, there is no significant difference between the two
> patches. For honest work will need used the CAS for all IF statement.
What?
> Thanks! Hope for understanding. ^_^
There's pretty little understanding left at this point. You're posting
things for review and you seem completely unwilling to actually respond
to points raised.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
