Re: checkpointer continuous flushing - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: checkpointer continuous flushing
Date
Msg-id 20150909191232.GA12694@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: checkpointer continuous flushing  (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>)
Responses Re: checkpointer continuous flushing  (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>)
Re: checkpointer continuous flushing  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2015-09-09 20:56:15 +0200, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> As I wrote before, FreeBSD would be a good candidate because the
> posix_fadvise seems much more reasonable than on Linux, and should be
> profitable, so it would be a pity to remove it.

Why do you think it's different on fbsd? Also, why is it unreasonable
that DONNEED removes stuff from the cache?

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Latent cache flush hazard in RelationInitIndexAccessInfo
Next
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: checkpointer continuous flushing