Re: WIP: About CMake v2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: WIP: About CMake v2
Date
Msg-id 20150828153926.GG4857@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WIP: About CMake v2  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: WIP: About CMake v2
Re: WIP: About CMake v2
List pgsql-hackers
On 2015-08-28 12:32:45 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> YUriy Zhuravlev wrote:
> > Hello Hackers
> > 
> > How would you react if I provided a patch which introduces a CMake build 
> > system?
> 
> What's your motivation for doing so?

I definitely can see some advantages. Non-broken dependencies around
recursive make being a major one. But I'm also afraid it's a rather
large undertaking. There's a fair number of special kind of rules, and
we're probably not going to want to break pgxs for extensions.

I also have some doubts around the portability of cmake and it's
generated makefiles. We do support some odd platforms.

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: One question about security label command
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: AcquireRewriteLocks/acquireLocksOnSubLinks vs. rowsecurity