More WITH - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Fetter
Subject More WITH
Date
Msg-id 20150817171833.GB32300@fetter.org
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: More WITH  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Folks,

In the interest of consistency, which is to say, of not hitting
barriers that are essentially implementation details, I'd like to
propose that we allow the rest of the row-returning commands inside
WITH clauses.  We currently have:

SELECT
VALUES
INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE ... RETURNING

We don't yet have:

EXPLAIN [ANALYZE]
SHOW
FETCH

A little further out there, although this would be an API change, we
might consider allowing the results of VACUUM and ANALYZE as row sets,
which would also be good to wrap in WITH.

Is there a good reason, or more than one, why we shouldn't have all
the row-returning commands in WITH?

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: More WITH