Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6
Date
Msg-id 20150807171732.GD4916@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2015-08-07 19:11:52 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> I think the likelihood of actually breaking correct working extension
> code that uses namespace.h that'd be broken if we removed lock.h from
> namespace.h is an order of magnitude bigger than the possible impact on
> frontend code.

Same with dropping lwlock.h from lock.h. I tried both and the former
required more than 20 added headers in backend code, and the latter
about 5. I'm pretty sure the same would be true external extensions.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Reduce ProcArrayLock contention