Re: Autovacuum behavior - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Autovacuum behavior
Date
Msg-id 20150730190752.GU2441@postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Autovacuum behavior  (John Scalia <jayknowsunix@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Autovacuum behavior
List pgsql-admin
John Scalia wrote:
> autovacuum_vacuum_cost_limit is currently set at -1. Not really sure what
> it should be, as I still need to look that up.

Yes, I saw that from your snippet, but that value means to use the value
from vacuum_cost_limit.  If that one is set to a positive value, it may
lead to sleeps during vacuum.

Also, tables could have values set in pg_class.reloptions, leading to
sleeps.

--
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] How Many PG_Locks are considered too many
Next
From: John Scalia
Date:
Subject: Re: Autovacuum behavior