On 2015-07-29 12:54:59 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> I would try to avoid changing lwlock.c. It's pretty easy when so
> doing to create mechanisms that work now but make further upgrades to
> the general lwlock mechanism difficult. I'd like to avoid that.
I'm massively doubtful that re-implementing parts of lwlock.c is the
better outcome. Then you have two different infrastructures you need to
improve over time.
