On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 02:31:07AM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> But really, the typedef list is the minor part what annoys me about
> pgindent. That it completely butchers so many constructs (e.g. function
> pointer typedefs, inline asm as extreme examples) is much worse. It's
> also neigh on impossible to predict/keep the indentation pgindent will
> use in many cases. Having to try to write code in a way that doesn't
> break the re-indentation tool, even if it'd otherwise be fine, is just
> absurd.
What does "break" mean here? Considering we are indenting 1.4M lines of
code, skipping ASM files seems pretty minor.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
