Re: deparsing utility commands - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: deparsing utility commands
Date
Msg-id 20150511222507.GX2523@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: deparsing utility commands  (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>)
Responses Re: deparsing utility commands  ("Shulgin, Oleksandr" <oleksandr.shulgin@zalando.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
David Steele wrote:

> I have reviewed and tested this patch and everything looks good to me.
> It also looks like you added better coverage for schema DDL, which is a
> welcome addition.

Thanks -- I have pushed this now.

My hope is to get this test module extended quite a bit, not only to
cover existing commands, but also so that it causes future changes to
cause failure unless command collection is considered.  (In a previous
version of this patch, there was a test mode that ran everything in the
serial_schedule of regular regression tests.  That was IMV a good way to
ensure that new commands were also tested to run under command
collection.  That hasn't been enabled in the new test module, and I
think it's necessary.)

If anyone wants to contribute to the test module so that more is
covered, that would be much appreciated.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Multi-xacts and our process problem
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: EvalPlanQual behaves oddly for FDW queries involving system columns