Re: "rejected" vs "returned with feedback" in new CF app - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: "rejected" vs "returned with feedback" in new CF app
Date
Msg-id 20150409131721.GB32335@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: "rejected" vs "returned with feedback" in new CF app  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2015-04-09 15:09:55 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> If we just link the email thread, that would mean we loose all those
> precious annotations we just added support for. Is that really what you
> meant? We also loose all history of a patch, and can't see that a previous
> version existed in a previous commitfest, without manually checking each
> and every one. But if that's a history we don't *want*, that's of course
> doable, but it seems wrong to me?

It'd be better if we kept them, but it's not *that* important imo. But
if the (documented) workflow would be to go to the old cf and click the
'move to next CF' button that'd not be a problem anyway.

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_restore -t should match views, matviews, and foreign tables
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Row security violation error is misleading