On 2015-03-19 12:50:09 +0000, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> For me the big question is whether software written to retry a
> transaction from the beginning when it gets this SQLSTATE would be
> doing something dumb to retry transactions (perhaps after a brief
> delay) for the conflict with recovery. If using the same automated
> recovery techniques is sane, then IMO it makes sense to use the
> same SQLSTATE.
Yes, it imo makes sense to use the same techniques. In both cases you
need to keep enough state to give up at some point; the combination of
running transactions might make the likelihood of succeeding too low.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
-- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services
