Since I don't have clear idea how to promote this, I will remake
and be back with new patch based on Andres' for patches.
> Hmm.. Sorry for my stupidity.
>
> > Why is that necessary? It seems really rather wrong to make
> > BIO_set_retry_write() dependant on ProcDiePending? Especially as, at
> > least in my testing, it's not even required because the be_tls_write()
> > can just check the error properly?
>
> I mistook the previous conversation as it doesn't work as
> expected. I confirmed that it works fine.
>
> After all, it works as I expected. The parameter for
> ProcessClientWriteInterrupt() looks somewhat uneasy but the patch
> 4 looks fine as a whole. Do you have anything to worry about in
> the patch?
regards,
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
