On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 06:37:38AM +0100, Andrew Gierth wrote:
> >>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk> writes:
>
> Andrew> I was holding off on posting a recut patch with the latest
> Andrew> EXPLAIN formatting changes (which are basically cosmetic)
> Andrew> until it became clear whether RLS was likely to be reverted
> Andrew> or kept (we have a tiny but irritating conflict with it, in
> Andrew> the regression test schedule file where we both add to the
> Andrew> same list of tests).
>
> And here is that recut patch set.
>
> Changes since last posting (other than conflict removal):
>
> - gsp1.patch: clearer EXPLAIN output as per discussion
>
> Recut patches:
>
> gsp1.patch - phase 1 code patch (full syntax, limited functionality)
> gsp2.patch - phase 2 code patch (adds full functionality using the
> new chained aggregate mechanism)
> gsp-doc.patch - docs
> gsp-contrib.patch - quote "cube" in contrib/cube and contrib/earthdistance,
> intended primarily for testing pending a decision on
> renaming contrib/cube or unreserving keywords
> gsp-u.patch - proposed method to unreserve CUBE and ROLLUP
>
> (the contrib patch is not necessary if the -u patch is used; the
> contrib/pg_stat_statements fixes are in the phase1 patch)
>
> --
> Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
>
Tom, any word on this?
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
