Tom Lane wrote:
> Not entirely sure what to do about this. It seems like for the purposes
> of contrib/chkpass, it's a good thing that chkpass_in() won't reuse the
> same salt. Weak as a 12-bit salt might be nowadays, it's still better
> than no salt. Nonetheless, this behavior is breaking assumptions made
> in places like array_in and record_in.
>
> For the moment I'm tempted to mark chkpass_in as stable (with a comment
> explaining that it isn't really) just so we can put in the error check
> in CREATE TYPE. But I wonder if anyone has a better idea.
Can we have a separate function that accepts unencrypted passwords, and
change chkpass_in to only accept encrypted ones? Similar to
to_tsquery() et al.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
