Re: Code bug or doc bug? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Code bug or doc bug?
Date
Msg-id 20141013161754.GZ21267@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Code bug or doc bug?  (David G Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Code bug or doc bug?
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 06:39:21AM -0700, David G Johnston wrote:
> > Is there a doc patch to make here?
>
> 1. Last sentence change suggestion: "The target tablespace must be empty."
>
> 2. Based on Robert's comments it sounds like a "You cannot change the
> default tablespace of the current database." comment should be added as
> well.
>
> Side note: I have no clue what the "mapped relations" Robert refers to
> are...

I have created the attached doc patch for this.  Should we backpatch
this through 9.0, or just 9.4?

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + Everyone has their own god. +

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: [9.4 bug] The database server hangs with write-heavy workload on Windows
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Hide 'Execution time' in EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)