Re: Code bug or doc bug? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Code bug or doc bug?
Date
Msg-id 20141018142352.GA16974@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Code bug or doc bug?  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 12:17:54PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 06:39:21AM -0700, David G Johnston wrote:
> > > Is there a doc patch to make here?
> > 
> > 1. Last sentence change suggestion: "The target tablespace must be empty."
> > 
> > 2. Based on Robert's comments it sounds like a "You cannot change the
> > default tablespace of the current database." comment should be added as
> > well.
> > 
> > Side note: I have no clue what the "mapped relations" Robert refers to
> > are...
> 
> I have created the attached doc patch for this.  Should we backpatch
> this through 9.0, or just 9.4?

Applied.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + Everyone has their own god. +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: get_actual_variable_range vs idx_scan/idx_tup_fetch
Next
From: Marko Tiikkaja
Date:
Subject: Re: get_actual_variable_range vs idx_scan/idx_tup_fetch