jim_yates wrote:
> Then I'm really confused.
> The minimum relminmxid for all the rows in pg_class that have relminmxid
> greater then zero is 1.
> That's the current value of datminmxid in pg_database.
>
> And the NextMultiXactId from pg_controldump is 303464.
>
> So if I use the min value from pg_class then I have some other issue.
>
> Where should I get the new pg_database value from?
I'm deep in another issue which I don't want to page out right now, but
try vacuuming the tables that have relminmxid=1 with low values set for
vacuum_multixact_freeze_table_age and vacuum_multixact_freeze_min_age,
say 100000. (I think 65536 ought to get you beyond segment
pg_multixact/offset/0000, and then that file would be removed.) Since
any multixact values below the point at which pg_upgrade ran should be
marked "no longer running" through hint bits, there would be no
pg_multixact lookups anyway and thus the vacuuming should complete with
no errors.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
